Is an adult's hand really necessary in the frame? The boy just has a charming face. And if we somehow made a separate portrait of him, perhaps he'd look more interesting.
Does an adult's hand really need to be in the frame? The boy just has a charming face. And if we somehow make his portrait separate, it might look more interesting.
Irina Rodkina, I thought it would be clearer who the boy was addressing. He looks dependent and doesn't want to leave. And his charm adds poignancy to the story. I'm just used to looking for a little story in every photograph.
Does an adult's hand really need to be in the frame? The boy just has a charming face. And if we somehow make a separate portrait of him, it might look more interesting.
Remove the hand and you'll get a portrait of a head, of which there are a ton here
Nikolay Semenov, I don't think there's any point in looking around, judging what's abundant and what's scarce, that's not the point...) But you're right, without the hand it's a portrait, and with the hand it's a genre piece, a richer relationship, a richer photo.
Nikolay Semenov, I don't think there's any point in looking around, judging what's abundant and what's scarce. That's not the point..) But you're right, without a hand it's a portrait, but with a hand it's a genre piece, a richer relationship, a photo.)
Zanzib, Why don't you think so? What if you suddenly wanted to use the popularity of the headshot as an argument and look around? What's the matter? Explain it so I understand my mistake, if there is one.
Zanzib, Why don't you think so? What if you suddenly wanted to use the popularity of the headshot as an argument and look around? What's the matter? Explain it so I understand my mistake, if there is one.
Nikolay Semenov, No, it's not a mistake, of course... I'm just in favor of not looking around at the tastes of the statistical majority and all sorts of Rodkin's.
But you're right, without the hand it's a portrait, and with the hand it's a genre piece, a richer relationship, a richer photo.