F 0 C, this is my answer to the question "imagine, and that's it?.." Usually, all sorts of toshi-busi write that something is wrong, you can only find out for money or if you put someone on a horse. Although, everything is IMHO
I like the overall treatment, but I would go over the face and neck area with an eraser on the grunge texture layer. Although, maybe that's the intention. Each marker is a matter of taste.
Alexander Pukhov, you can find out what's wrong yourself through the thought process and throwing all sorts of "cool" pictures, rules, texts, etc. into your head. I don't want to put anyone on a horse, but as for paying... I'd rather buy film and think for myself))) of course, IMHO, so - Olga Loiko, yes, I also thought for a long time whether I needed it.. but then I decided that it has its own special charm.. besides, this very detail makes the frame asymmetrical, unless you count the scarf of course)))))) and the face... yes. In my defense, I can only say that it turned out like this in the original... there is not a single texture on it. It's all lighting and color correction.
F 0 C, it happens. There were so many lines, I couldn't read them carefully. ;) Now, on the second pass, I found a solution to the lack of textures on the face. ;)
And the editing is interesting.
Also, the face looks a bit dirty after processing. Perhaps it should have been processed more thoroughly.
Olga Loiko, yes, I also thought for a long time whether I needed it.. but then I decided that it has its own special charm.. besides, this very detail makes the frame asymmetrical, unless you count the scarf of course)))))) and the face... yes. In my defense, I can only say that it turned out like this in the original... there is not a single texture on it. It's all lighting and color correction.
But what's confusing is your phrase "?
If it's not a secret, what's so artistic about the scratches on the matrix?
Let's wait for the author's response.