Interestingly, after 100 views, the photo received two ratings, both mutually exclusive: 10 and 1. As we can see, the truth isn't always in the middle 5.5 = So, mediocre or good? I'd appreciate any criticism. Sincerely, VK
What do you think? When a full-size image is marred by poor quality, how else can one evaluate a defective photo?
I agree, if that's the case. Unfortunately, I can't evaluate the image quality on my old computer. I no longer post old photos, or do so with great caution. Thank you.
The view is excellent, but the processing is a bit of a letdown. It's severely oversharpened...obviously they sharpened it before processing, when sharpening should be as precise as a period in a sentence. As it is, the resulting image looks too digital and blurry. I recommend viewing it—you'll have to work hard to find a suitable location, but I don't recommend processing it this way—it ruins all the work.
Severely oversharpened...obviously they sharpened before processing, but sharpening should be like a period in a sentence. As it is, the resulting image looks too digital and blurry. I recommend viewing it—you'll have to work hard to find a place like that, but I don't recommend processing it this way—it negates all the work.
I'm very, very grateful to you, Alexander, for your insightful professional review and insight; it's exactly like that: I didn't study photo processing, which I now deeply regret.
As we can see, the truth isn't always in the middle
I'd appreciate any criticism.
Sincerely,
VK
Unfortunately, I can't evaluate the image quality on my old computer. I no longer post old photos, or do so with great caution. Thank you.