Four rivers already. Anyone else going to complain, or can we consider the "list of shame" closed? I have to write a video, so I have a request for the complainers: hurry up.
Four rivers already. Anyone else going to complain, or can we consider the "list of shame" closed? I have to write a video, so I have a request for the complainers - hurry up.
Country doctor, It seems like six already... Can I ask a question? Isn't it a waste of time on videos? Do you think anyone needs them? No, no, it's just a question, not a statement that they're not interesting to local participants. You see, anyone who wants it will find all the information that's already been written many, many times. Said, shown, and analyzed!!! You see, you can't blame the author alone for this, just as you can't blame those who recommend it on the site, no matter this photograph or another.
First of all, people don't want to delve into all the nuances of graphic processing of the frame and other compositional and technical components. They click based on the principle of a beautiful picture they see in front of them. Well, read the comments - under any work - the most typical, ordinary, enthusiastic comments. There's no analysis, no technical literacy, or anything else to be seen there, not to mention any artistic or, for that matter, creative vision! People simply see a beautiful picture. Not a photograph, not a digital snapshot, not a photographer's work, but simply a picture. And these are viewers who are also the creators of those same "beautiful pictures." That's enough for them!!! They don't want to think, rack their brains with complex technical issues, and so on. It's not their fault that they were simply offered the opportunity to idly pass the time looking at beautiful pictures on one of the many websites. But the price for this is such that they are constantly forced to somehow pay attention to their pictures—and they have no other option here. Basically, no one has one, except by "going to the people." But I'm still waiting for the video!
Anyone else going to complain, or can we consider the "list of shame" closed?
I have to write a video, so I have a request for the complainers: hurry up.
You see, you can't blame the author alone for this, just as you can't blame those who recommend it on the site, no matter this photograph or another.
First of all, people don't want to delve into all the nuances of graphic processing of the frame and other compositional and technical components. They click based on the principle of a beautiful picture they see in front of them. Well, read the comments - under any work - the most typical, ordinary, enthusiastic comments. There's no analysis, no technical literacy, or anything else to be seen there, not to mention any artistic or, for that matter, creative vision! People simply see a beautiful picture. Not a photograph, not a digital snapshot, not a photographer's work, but simply a picture. And these are viewers who are also the creators of those same "beautiful pictures." That's enough for them!!! They don't want to think, rack their brains with complex technical issues, and so on. It's not their fault that they were simply offered the opportunity to idly pass the time looking at beautiful pictures on one of the many websites. But the price for this is such that they are constantly forced to somehow pay attention to their pictures—and they have no other option here. Basically, no one has one, except by "going to the people."
But I'm still waiting for the video!
Honestly, I wasn't even planning on it.
I like Moscow, thanks to you!