Good afternoon, Anton. The presentation is very "delicious." I like it, but I think the two white balls above the model's head, cut off by the top edge of the frame, are a bit too many... and if you leave only the one on the right (from the viewer), and remove the small one from the frame, the picture will become more profound and 100% complete... Some might say it's a small thing..., but in good photography there are no small things... Thank you, Anton, for the interesting photos.
Good afternoon, Anton. The presentation is very "tasty." I like it, but I think the two white balls above the model's head, cropped off by the top edge of the frame, are a bit much... and if you leave only the one on the right (from the viewer) and remove the small one from the frame, the photo will become more profound and truly accomplished... Some might say it's a small thing, but there are no small things in good photography... Thank you, Anton, for the interesting photographs.
Vladimir Ermolaev, Vladimir, hello. Thanks for your comment. You might be right.
I like it, but I think the two white balls cut off by the top edge of the frame above the model's head are a bit much...
The balls don't bother me; in fact, the balls look good here. I don't like the intersection of the shadows on the cheek; it looks ugly, and I don't like the vertical shadow outline in the middle of the face—the contours of the vertical shadow on a face aren't feminine, but straight out of a horror story.
The balls don't bother me, in fact, the balls look good here. I don't like the intersection of the shadows on my cheek; it looks unsightly, and I don't like the vertical shadow outline in the middle of my face—the shadow outline on my face isn't feminine, it's like something out of a horror story.
The balloons don't bother me, in fact, the balloons look good here. I don't like the place where the shadows intersect on the cheek; it looks ugly, and I don't like the vertical shadow outline in the middle of the face—the contours of a vertical shadow on a face aren't feminine, but straight out of a horror story.
Marina Glebova, Good afternoon, Marina. I agree with you about the shadows—they're ugly..., but perhaps the author made this choice deliberately...? And if so, Anton deliberately "thickened the colors," thereby enhancing the INTERNAL MOVEMENT and the dramatic moment in the frame... The balloons are certainly good, but the left one, or rather the part of it that remains in the frame, is neither here nor there (as I wrote above) UNJUSTIFIED!!! and moreover, it does not allow the photograph to be realized, deprives it (the photograph) of integrity... Let me remind you what is INTERNAL MOVEMENT in a photograph - "A REAL FEELING OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARTISTIC IMAGE IN THE SPACE-TIME OF IMAGINARY REALITY", in other words, INVENTED BY THE AUTHOR... Thank you.
Good afternoon, Marina. I agree with you about the shadows - they are not beautiful..., but perhaps the author made this choice consciously...? And, if so, Anton deliberately "thickened the colors", thereby enhancing the INTERNAL MOVEMENT and the dramatic moment in the frame... The balls are certainly good, but the left one, or rather the part of it that remained in the frame - is neither here nor there (I wrote above) IS NOT JUSTIFIED!!! and moreover, it does not allow the picture to be realized, deprives it (the picture) of integrity... Let me remind you what is INTERNAL MOVEMENT in a picture - " A REAL FEELING OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARTISTIC IMAGE IN THE SPACE-TIME OF AN "IMAGINARY" REALITY, in other words, INVENTED BY THE AUTHOR... Thank you.
Vladimir Ermolaev, I meant the contour line itself. And "thickening the colors" doesn't hurt—why not? I can also agree with the piece of the top ball—it could be removed for the sake of perfectionism.
Marina Glebova, Good afternoon, Marina. I agree with you about the shadows - they are not beautiful..., but perhaps the author made this choice consciously...? And, if so, Anton deliberately "thickened the colors", thereby enhancing the INTERNAL MOVEMENT and the dramatic moment in the frame... The balls are certainly good, but the left one, or rather the part of it that remained in the frame - is neither here nor there (I wrote above) IS NOT JUSTIFIED!!! and moreover, it does not allow the picture to be realized, deprives it (the picture) of integrity... Let me remind you what is INTERNAL MOVEMENT in a picture - " A REAL FEELING OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ARTISTIC IMAGE IN THE SPACE-TIME OF IMAGINARY REALITY, in other words, INVENTED BY THE AUTHOR... Thank you.
Vladimir Ermolaev, excuse me, could you please use less caps? Traditionally, anything written in caps online is perceived as shouting, screeching, or talking in a raised voice. I'm reading your discussion of "works," but I can't help but feel nervous. Thank you in advance for your understanding.
Vladimir Ermolaev, excuse me, could you please use less caps? Traditionally, anything written in caps online is perceived as shouting, screaming, or raised voices. I'm reading your discussion of "works," but I can't help but feel a little nervous. Thank you in advance for your understanding.
Zanzib, Please forgive me, sir (I don't know your name), if I've unintentionally upset you or made you nervous... I'll try to make amends...))) Thank you.
Zanzib, Please forgive me, dear sir (I don't know your name), if I've unwittingly upset you or made you nervous... I'll try to make it up to you...))) Thank you.
Traditionally, anything written in caps online is perceived as shouting, screeching, or talking in a raised voice. I'm reading your discussion of "works," but I can't help but feel nervous. Thank you in advance for your understanding.