Aha, I see it's working already. But I must say it's a bit murky and unclear in places. The author's depiction of his beloved chairs was especially poor. And, in fact, I didn't immediately recognize the author from the preview.
Maybe finally, or even ultimately, someone will give me a definition of "High. Artistic. Works"? I still can't figure it out. Maybe I have some of those too, and I just don't know.
Maybe, finally, or even ultimately, someone will give me a definition of "High. Artistic. Works"? I still can't figure it out. Maybe I have some, too, and I don't know.
Suvlehim Takats, I'll give you a Suvlehim, but it's my own. One that only I understand. If an ordinary photo is 10 percent author-driven, the rest is just how it turned out, how it all came together, then it's ordinary. Highly artistic work has a lot of author-driven in it.
Good afternoon, Boris. It's not often I see color from you))), but that makes it all the more pleasant... A heartfelt, strong photo, with a mood in the frame... Filled with feelings and sensations... Thank you.
Suvlehim Takats, I'll give you my own. Only I understand it. If a regular photo is 10 percent author-driven, the rest is just how it happened, how it all came together, then it's ordinary. Highly artistic work has a lot of author-driven work there.
Vyacheslav Poznoy, I see, thank you. So, I don't have any "highly artistic works." There, for me, everything is "how it all happened." And "highly artistic works" are neuroslope—they're all author-driven, prompts, finger-count adjustments, and explanatory text. Now I'll know.
Aha, I see it's working already. But I must say it's a bit murky and unclear in places. The author's depiction of his beloved chairs was especially poor. And, in fact, I didn't immediately recognize the author from the preview.
Suvlehim Takats, I can also tell you that a couple of times along the way I had to unscrew the Leica in the pouring rain. Of course, I had no time for chairs...
Good afternoon, Boris. It's not often I see color from you))), but that makes it all the more pleasant... A heartfelt, strong photo, with a mood in the frame... Capturing feelings and sensations... Thank you.
Vladimir Ermolaev, We got really wet in Arles, but the city demands color there...
Suvlehim Takats, I can also tell you that a couple of times along the way I had to unscrew the Leica in the pouring rain. Of course, there was no time for chairs...
Boris Gurevich, Just not at night. Otherwise, I'd have such dreams about a camera that Stephen King looks like wallpaper with the Brothers Grimm, with his fairy tales.
It was inspired by Halloween, there's a skull glowing in the darkness of the night, and the character is also on topic, just before All Saints' Day, October 31st is just around the corner
Vyacheslav Poznoy, I see, thank you. So, I don't have any "highly artistic works." There, for me, everything "happened." And "highly artistic works" are neuroslope - everything there is the author's own, and prompts, and finger count processing, and explanatory text. Now I'll know.
Suvlehim Takats, it's not all that clear-cut (he sighed thoughtfully). Maybe there wasn't any effort put into the photo, but you look at it and the author looms there, climbed in.
Suvlehim Takats, it's not all clear-cut (he sighed thoughtfully). Maybe there wasn't any effort put into the photo, but you look at it and the author looms there, swiping his nose.
Vyacheslav Poznoy, As for me, photographs aren't divided into good and bad, or by the degree of artistic presence, but into interesting and uninteresting. Personally, for you. But overall, 99% of the photos here are good. Maybe a little less due to the recent increase in neuroslope. But it also has its grateful audience.
Suvlehim Takats, I held the umbrella myself, but it didn't help... I got completely soaked.
Boris Gurevich, When I held the umbrella myself, it kept sliding forward, blocking the frame. It was somehow awkward to hold both the umbrella and the camera. As a result, I got soaked and didn't get a good shot. But the photo is good.
Vyacheslav Poznoy, As for me, photographs aren't divided into good and bad, or by the degree of artistic flair, but into interesting and uninteresting. Personally, for you. Actually, 99% of the photos here are good. Maybe a little less due to the recent increase in neuroslope. But it also has its grateful audience.
Suvlehim Takats, but what do you do when the viewer has just emerged from the forest? Doesn't he have any aesthetic tastes or artistic perceptions? Many people are prone to making mistakes, and even more so, to thinking their opinion is the only correct one, so they'll follow Ms. Vera Ketova. Like it or not, that's not our method. Listening to the expert community and aligning your thoughts—that's the right move. For me.
Suvlehim Takats, but what do you do when the viewer has just emerged from the forest? Doesn't he have any aesthetic tastes or artistic perceptions? Many people are prone to mistakes, and even more so to thinking that their opinion is the only correct one, so they will follow Mrs. Vera Ketova. Like it or not, that's not our method. Listening to the expert community, synchronizing your watch—that's the right move. For me.
Vyacheslav Poznoy, We all came out of the forest at some point. And some, like in the children's joke about Vovochka, who hadn't learned a poem, and was called upon to answer, answered: "One day, in the cold winter, I came out of the forest... and re-entered." Experts—every second person here—Vera Ketova is an expert in the honey plant community, one of them. Well, everyone has their own preferences here. Some people like still lifes (I'm not interested), some like landscapes (the same thing), and some like portraits (I've photographed so much of this stuff that it's become boring). On this and similar sites, any kind of expert community is simply impossible. People would immediately start talking about "Who are the judges?" Especially since two-thirds of the people here only accept positive reviews; if you criticize them, they'll immediately label you "Troll!" or take revenge, stupidly, viciously. And I haven't seen any expert opinions under the photographs here, only expert opinions.
Why do people tell me I'm bad at appreciating highly artistic works? Well, I do! And I'm glad about it.
Now I'll know.
But the photo is good.
Experts—every second person here—Vera Ketova is an expert in the honey plant community, one of them. Well, everyone has their own preferences here. Some people like still lifes (I'm not interested), some like landscapes (the same thing), and some like portraits (I've photographed so much of this stuff that it's become boring).
On this and similar sites, any kind of expert community is simply impossible. People would immediately start talking about "Who are the judges?" Especially since two-thirds of the people here only accept positive reviews; if you criticize them, they'll immediately label you "Troll!" or take revenge, stupidly, viciously.
And I haven't seen any expert opinions under the photographs here, only expert opinions.