Excellent! Pigeons are taking this photo.

VICTOR K. (NetHunter), I was here! Didn't recognize her? Do you think this one is better than the previous one?

Author, better. Mostra ritaglio - this character is interesting. And these: Mostra ritaglio . In general, it's interesting to look at the people here. Some are interested in the pigeons, others are interested in the photographer: Mostra ritaglio. I like the composition. The black and white is good. And the pigeons are the most important thing here.

You're a real pain, Valentin

Yeah, well, everyone's already guessed who the author is
and there really is more to life in this one

shot off the cuff, turning around to hear the sound of wings

- usually random shots are the best ones

VICTOR K. (NetHunter), I was talking about luck then! I didn't even have time to zoom in - it was just too tight. We have different interests - I, a heartless person, treat tourists with cameras like another tourist with a camera - they get in the frame and everything gets blocked. Well, about the annoying stuff - write more specifically!

Author, I don't feel like it. I'm lazy.

VICTOR K. (NetHunter), well then, without any ambiguous innuendo, if you had just said a few words about the beautiful view and atmosphere, I wouldn't have needed to answer, because I agree 100%. Otherwise, it's like, "Look at the real photo, I didn't try hard enough, etc." I still had to write more Thanks for the informative conversation. Good luck with the photos!

Author, stop. So, if the photo didn't turn out, I still have to praise it and say how beautiful the view and atmosphere are?

VICTOR K. (NetHunter), no way. Feel free to criticize, but understand. Your opinion is important to me. I always want to repeat what I've already said:

If you had just said a few words about the beautiful view (it's just a well-written tourist postcard) and the atmosphere (it's there, but I don't see it here), I wouldn't even need to answer, because I agree 100%. Otherwise, look at the real photo, I didn't try, etc.

. I'm speaking in the context of what was said above, as a response to you. This is probably where the dog of misunderstanding is buried - in the imperfections of online communication. Probably more useful

Author,

VICTOR K. (NetHunter) ronin, ash, Sergei Khariton, Alexander Lebedev, troyka, Olga Seleznyova and everyone who dropped by SPSB, come again!

In my opinion, it was a mistake to process the pigeons (edges), they look artificial, especially here: Mostra ritaglio .

Jakov Trembovolsky (Jak Trum), I didn't process the pigeons. Perhaps the conversion to black and white or the compression contributed something, but I don't see it. Maybe it's the coloring or the lighting

Valentin Zakharov, I don't really understand landscapes... they just don't work for me) but when I look at your pictures, a sense of presence arises... some kind of magical atmosphere is created... in general, I have problems with the technical part of photography - I just don't understand it)) and I evaluate a picture based on the principle of "did it catch my attention or not". .. yours catch my attention... and I immediately want to visit those places))) thank you very much for your works. They have a mood, and are not banal-stating-the-fact-of-your-presence-there. I wrote a lot, ... in short, the conclusion: great!

Valentin, Anna Levankova lost your phone and can't contact you. She asked me to tell you to call her as soon as possible.

Krylova Anna, THANK YOU SO MUCH!

Thanks, BezRybnik, that's nice. I'm not much of a reporter, but I got lucky here... I think you'll visit many more places and the tech part won't let you down

pigeons=tourists a bunch of both