Mikaella Speranskaya, I agree about the PR, maybe it looks that way. I wanted to share that this topic is close to my heart... And what about those photos located directly below your work? So, the page designer should remove them too... You have the ability to delete unwanted comments; I don't mind deleting them.
Serg Dav., I have nothing against random automation. But that's not what happened in your case. To say that the plot resonates with you, it's enough to simply say so.
Mikaella Speranskaya, Simply "saying" is without evidence, the same as saying "like" or "dislike"—an unfounded comment. I just gave an example. Actually, you're right, our photos only vaguely resemble each other. After all, the entire setting, the scenery, and the cats were arranged by other people, for you. All you had to do was "click." Everything in my photos is real: real life, real characters, real emotions...
Serg Dav., Amen =) True, I don't remember you being present at our shoot, so confidently asserting who built what, who came up with what, who arranged whom, and who took what. I think these are the standard grievances of a non-studio person against studio people. A silly thing, by the way. We're not accusing you of capturing the truth of life just because your imagination is weak and your hands are in the wrong place and you can't create everything yourself, are we? =)
However, I wouldn't dare walk under the armored train of your talent. Eeeeh.
I had no doubt that everything would end up in this direction. Not original and not interesting, in short.
An interesting shot, there seem to be too many elements, nothing to really focus on. The photo is not a masterpiece, but it is good. It's strange that everyone is so aggressive.
It's interesting to look at the card like this; it's kind and I love cats. I'm writing despite the author's dislike of me, as well as everyone who comments anything other than "like," "good," and so on.
Victor K. (NetHunter), I'm afraid to disappoint you, but I honestly don't even remember who you are. But I'm glad you remember and know me. ) But since you say I don't like you, I'll try to remember that, just in case.
Since no one's really saying what they don't like, I'll say what I personally don't like is Mostra ritaglioMostra ritaglioMostra ritaglio. Too many accents, everything's all jumbled up: people with their loves and cats. Otherwise, it's an ordinary card; you'd pass by it and not even remember it existed, if not for the scandals, intrigues, and investigations in the comments. And an article like this would be very appropriate. http://photo-element.ru/book/garbage/garbage.html
Dmitry Ivanchikov (Dmitry Iv), well, God bless you... move on. No one's forcing you to watch, and there's no checkbox anywhere that says I'm interested in criticism from a random minimalist landscape artist.
Every detail in the frame, every "trash" is lovingly brought and arranged into the scene and plays a specific role in this story. If you like photographing leaves against the sky, go ahead. I won't tell you how to best diversify your subjects, and honestly, don't tell me how to combine more than two elements in a frame. Certainly not you, I'm sorry.
That's all. I'm not interested in your opinion. Sorry.
Mono, I think this photo... a staged, cute, positive postcard about old age, love, and cats. You're supposed to look at it and smile, just like normal people do. =) It's incredibly stupid to try to find any deep meaning or anything else in it.
This isn't even a comment specifically for you, it's just a general comment. It's just ridiculous to read this madhouse that's been created here.
Now, to avoid any misunderstandings, I'm ready for criticism. I'll hear criticism from studio directors. I don't want it from landscape painters, street photographers, genre artists, and the like. I'm not interested. I know the theory without you. Go away.
Mikaella Speranskaya, your position is clear. The clarification was necessary. Thank you! The photo is actually good, but for some reason the author doesn't quite understand the outcome. This theme will be more clearly expressed in the series.
Dmitry Ivanchikov (Dmitry Iv), only on Russian-language resources do people like to write about things they weren't asked for. a) I'm not interested in criticism from you. b) The "I want criticism" checkbox is NOT checked under "work." What makes you think I need it then? Your expert opinion isn't needed, so you're trying to shove it in anywhere? My condolences. c) You have the right to express your opinion about whether you like something or not. If you criticize "how it should be," please do it yourself just as well and be an expert in that genre. You can turn up your nose and say the soup is yuck, but if you're going to tell a chef how to cook it properly—go away. d) You have a very low self-respect to continue writing pointless rants after someone tells you your words aren't interesting.
To sum it up. Please go away. If you can't smile at a cute card or postcard, that's your problem. Write down all your complaints in Word. Reread them many times, then sign the bottom: "I don't care about your quirks and lack of creative thinking. Mikaela." Enjoy!
All the best. Don't bother writing rants anymore—I'll delete them without reading them. Save yourself the time!
Cool! Here (as on all other sites), many authors make fun of each other, use sarcasm, publish parodies of famous photographers' photos, and otherwise have fun. But with such scope... it's COOL! Barat was good in this regard. Very serious and with scope. Really made me smile. But, alas, he slid into politics.
Atlas, I'm afraid you also saw a black cat in a dark room that wasn't there. No one was making fun of anyone. Especially not on a grand scale. We simply took a picture of a postcard about love. If it reminded you of anything, that's just how it happens. And I have no idea who Barat is, and I don't think I even want to know.
Atlas, I'm afraid you also saw a black cat in a dark room that wasn't there. No one was making fun of anyone, especially not on a grand scale. We simply took a picture of a postcard about love. If it reminded you of anything, well, that's just how it is. And I have no idea who Barat is, and I don't think I even want to know.
Mikaella Speranskaya, if you don't know who Barat is, then why did you assume my comment was addressed to you (and your team) personally, and not to your spiteful critics?
Atlas, because if you want to discuss what the commentators are posting with such fanfare for mockery, then you should do it under their work. Or contact them separately. If you haven't done the first or second, then you're contacting me. Russian is such a Russian language. 2 x 2 = 4.
Atlas, because if you want to discuss what the commentators are posting with such abandon for mockery, then it's best to do so under their work. Or contact them separately. If you haven't done either, then you're contacting me. Russian is such a Russian language. 2 x 2 = 4.
Mikaella Speranskaya, logical! It's such a rarity, at all times, when creative individuals not only pour soul and emotion into their artistic works, but also possess logical thinking! An immediate association comes to mind: Leonardo da Vinci! I really enjoyed talking with you.
The work is superb! It conveys a warm, kind atmosphere well, which, unfortunately, can't be said about the atmosphere created by the author himself in the comments. Alas :(
Victor K. (NetHunter), if you are forced to ask, and therefore are not sure, is the answer to this question really that important for the final photograph?
I'm certainly not that skilled, but the different sizes of the cats confuse me. It's unclear what was planned and executed in the studio? I quote: every object, every "trash" was lovingly brought and arranged into the scene and plays a specific role in this plot. Sic! The only real things here are the elderly couple, the rug, and maybe a couple of other small things. The rest is fake. I can say in advance that I can't do such a thing. It seems to me that the author, tormented by "pseudo-critics," reacts inadequately even to well-intentioned comments. And that's sad.
Arkady, there are three cats on the right. They were perfectly alive and beautiful cats, walking around the set. They were different sizes, because cats come in different sizes.
Very sweet. A kind performance. I don't know who's giving the 1s there; probably someone not very smart and not very honest. And very mean Why? And most importantly, for what reason? Maybe out of envy?
Super!!!
Strange question.
And what about those photos located directly below your work? So, the page designer should remove them too...
You have the ability to delete unwanted comments; I don't mind deleting them.
To say that the plot resonates with you, it's enough to simply say so.
Actually, you're right, our photos only vaguely resemble each other. After all, the entire setting, the scenery, and the cats were arranged by other people, for you. All you had to do was "click." Everything in my photos is real: real life, real characters, real emotions...
However, I wouldn't dare walk under the armored train of your talent. Eeeeh.
I had no doubt that everything would end up in this direction. Not original and not interesting, in short.
I feel like it's about to start.
And an article like this would be very appropriate. http://photo-element.ru/book/garbage/garbage.html
Every detail in the frame, every "trash" is lovingly brought and arranged into the scene and plays a specific role in this story. If you like photographing leaves against the sky, go ahead. I won't tell you how to best diversify your subjects, and honestly, don't tell me how to combine more than two elements in a frame. Certainly not you, I'm sorry.
That's all. I'm not interested in your opinion. Sorry.
This isn't even a comment specifically for you, it's just a general comment. It's just ridiculous to read this madhouse that's been created here.
The photo is actually good, but for some reason the author doesn't quite understand the outcome. This theme will be more clearly expressed in the series.
Keeps walking around the chain in circles;
ash, so that'll do
GET OUT
a) I'm not interested in criticism from you.
b) The "I want criticism" checkbox is NOT checked under "work." What makes you think I need it then? Your expert opinion isn't needed, so you're trying to shove it in anywhere? My condolences.
c) You have the right to express your opinion about whether you like something or not. If you criticize "how it should be," please do it yourself just as well and be an expert in that genre. You can turn up your nose and say the soup is yuck, but if you're going to tell a chef how to cook it properly—go away.
d) You have a very low self-respect to continue writing pointless rants after someone tells you your words aren't interesting.
To sum it up. Please go away. If you can't smile at a cute card or postcard, that's your problem. Write down all your complaints in Word. Reread them many times, then sign the bottom: "I don't care about your quirks and lack of creative thinking. Mikaela." Enjoy!
All the best. Don't bother writing rants anymore—I'll delete them without reading them. Save yourself the time!
Barat was good in this regard. Very serious and with scope. Really made me smile. But, alas, he slid into politics.
No one was making fun of anyone. Especially not on a grand scale. We simply took a picture of a postcard about love. If it reminded you of anything, that's just how it happens.
And I have no idea who Barat is, and I don't think I even want to know.
It's such a rarity, at all times, when creative individuals not only pour soul and emotion into their artistic works, but also possess logical thinking! An immediate association comes to mind: Leonardo da Vinci!
I really enjoyed talking with you.
I won't even comment on the fakes and all that. Well, that's what they said. It happens.
P.S. I'm on your side, if anything.
I don't know who's giving the 1s there; probably someone not very smart and not very honest. And very mean
So, the work caught my attention!
I really liked it. The idea is