Cute. Attractive. But explain why it's scaled so much that the butt is almost half the body. And what does the pose with the butt sticking out give? Why is that? Of course, legs grow from there, but not feet right away. Mostra ritaglio
Nice. Attractive. But explain why they scale it so much that the butt is almost half the body. And what does the pose with the butt sticking out really accomplish? Why do that? The legs certainly grow from there, but not the feet right away.
Alexey Sokolov, the butt is natural, and there's no scaling involved.
I'm not saying it's artificial, I'm saying that the angle is such that you know you can take a picture of a midget who will seem bigger than a Kamaz, but that's just a game, this is about a different photo, and everything looks as I wrote above.
Two feet sticking out of her butt—that's creative... She's a nice girl, but the angle really isn't great... Sergey Dzhonovich, the angle is debatable... it depends on what you want to see.
Roy, Of course it's debatable, that's what this discussion is for. All I see here is the girl's face looking at the camera, and her butt. And that's not just because those two points are on the borders of the third frame, but also because nothing else is really visible. And personally, I understand the connection between her gaze and the fifth point, so in my opinion, the angle isn't great.
What monstrously absurd hypocrisy... well, at the same time, you could also complain to the author about the partition between the windows, the blinds, the bed frame sticking out of her butt... so, everything behind the head, by this logic, is background, but whatever just happens to be behind the butt is bound to be sticking out of it, or something. "The connection between her gaze and her 5th point" is the girl herself, because most living creatures with a gaze usually also have a butt, but this girl's butt is amazingly beautiful
Nice work. The girl is wonderful, and everything she does is wonderful, and everything fits together beautifully. Is it really necessary to dissect the whole thing into what "sticks out" from where, and where what ended up, and in what third, if the whole is captivating and creates a mood?
Well, well!) All the men on the site gathered to stare at the ass, as if they had never seen one before...))) Look at how many views there are and they are all "boys"!!!)))
Many (not all) women still can't understand that looking at a girl's butt (or "ass," as you so "elegantly" put it) is like food for a man: just because you ate yesterday doesn't mean you won't want it today. Or tomorrow, or the day after. That's why it's such an eternal theme.
Andrew Kud, you know, in my opinion, the problem with many men who seem to have grown out of their youth is that they draw the line too seriously, with furrowed brows and puffed-out cheeks, between "looking at a girl's butt" and "looking at a photo of a girl's butt." But that, I think, is only half the problem. Their main problem is that they've become boors, absolutely convinced of their own rightness and that in this boorish, peremptory manner they speak with dignity and usefully in public debates.
Andrew Kud, you know, in my opinion, the problem with many men who seem to have grown out of their youth is that they draw the line too seriously, with furrowed brows and puffed-out cheeks, between "looking at a girl's butt" and "looking at a photo of a girl's butt." But that, I think, is only half the problem. Their main problem is that they've turned into boors, absolutely convinced of their own rightness and that this boorish, peremptory manner allows them to speak with dignity and usefully in public debates.
Karel Temny, I can't help but agree! Actually, just as with your previous comments! NMV, everything is quite logical and obviously natural! Work - I like it!
Many (not all) women still can't understand that looking at a girl's butt (or "ass," as you so "elegantly" put it) is like food for a man: if you ate yesterday, that doesn't mean you won't want it today. And tomorrow, and the day after. That's why the theme is eternal))
Magazines, like Playboy, have been invented for men's gastronomy. And thousands of specialized websites. This failure to understand this is the problem of many men who have grown up stallions...(crossed out) from their youth, who, upon finding themselves on an artistic photography website, for some cosmic reason, are unable to distinguish between "looking at a girl's butt," "looking at a photo of a girl's butt," and artistic nude photography.
Dmitry Kiselev, "stallion... (crossed out)" - were you trying to offend me or something? It's amazing how some men online act so naturally like women (sorry, women :)) - trying to make some petty barbs, being "subtly" rude Okay, let's move on, now to the point. In the real world, many boundaries are very fluid. That's one. In my opinion, it's not at all necessary to always observe them and put everything on the shelves. That's two. Well, three: if and when I deem it necessary, I am quite capable of drawing the necessary, from MY point of view, boundaries myself. And regarding "male gastronomy" - let everyone decide for themselves where and what to eat
But you're wasting your time. About the stallion and everything else. You got caught right at the beginning, and then again at the end, with your "man food" comment. Well, I didn't write that, did I? Not me. You yourself admitted that in photos like these, you see a dish of the freshest, most delicious girl, something you should eat, lick your lips, and praise. And am I against it? No. But this has nothing to do with art, as I wasn't the only one trying to hint at, apparently.
Dmitry Kiselev, are you a troll or something? I don't "dislike" this conversation, I just don't find it interesting. Let that be my last remark. Or have your last word, if you really want to, and that's it, okay?
"The connection between her gaze and her 5th point" is the girl herself, because most living creatures with a gaze usually also have a butt, but this girl's butt is amazingly beautiful
But you're wasting your time. About the stallion and everything else. You got caught right at the beginning, and then again at the end, with your "man food" comment. Well, I didn't write that, did I? Not me. You yourself admitted that in photos like these, you see a dish of the freshest, most delicious girl, something you should eat, lick your lips, and praise. And am I against it? No. But this has nothing to do with art, as I wasn't the only one trying to hint at, apparently.