Spectator, it's old and pointless to respond to anything, much less discuss it. Don't waste my time or yours. Shoot your masterpieces and amaze the world with them.)))
Spectator, it's old and no longer interesting to answer anything, let alone discuss it. Don't waste my time or yours. Film your masterpieces and amaze the world with them.)))
Evgeny Zhilyaev (EV6795), indeed...old and the best answer...you're the fool, you didn't expect anything else!...good luck!
Malakhov, Spectator, guys, take it easy It's spring outside, go for a walk. You're probably tired of criticizing around the clock and bringing education to the world Judging by your profile pictures, I can see it's hard for you Take a rest. Breathe in the spring air. And then continue your difficult and, most importantly, unnecessary criticism of everything and everyone. "Good luck" to you in your difficult and useless work
Evgeny Zhilyaev (EV6795), sir, you're such a generalizer and propagandist. You're spot on! I'm already exhausted from vigilantism and searching for targets for criticism. Don't you think that instead of calling for relaxation and raking out all sorts of characterizations for commentators, you should pay more attention to what you consider your own work? Which, thanks to your refined use of vignettes and Photoshop tricks, is becoming, unlike criticism, needed everywhere and by everyone?
Overall, I like the processing and photography!:super But I doubt the need for a white vignette here....it "eats up" the most interesting things in my opinion, forcing you to look only at the road.
Evgeny Zhilyaev (EV6795), I think this photo is good, and I like the vignetting because it adds an artistic touch. We've got a new troll – Spectator – with a declaration that's almost like Ronin's: "I hate it when people say 'interesting.'" His awkwardness is forgivable – he lives in Ireland and is forgetting Russian (or maybe he's doing it on purpose... He's just ranting, as trolls do). He's been on the site for a while now and knows a certain boor who used to call everyone "shitty photo" and "shitty photographer." I think you're right, Evgeny, when you advise trolls to get some fresh spring air; maybe they'll clear their heads and get some fresh air.
BBA, you're funny, sir. Whenever something doesn't go your way, you're immediately... a troll!... It's immediately obvious that the number of honey plants on this site is off the charts... but whatever, it's not interesting.
Spectator, I don't care about troll attacks these days, but I will respond to them, mostly when they're not directed at me. Evgeny Zhilyaev (EV6795), I've twice corrected "deliberately mispronounces," but instead of "mispronounces," it comes out as "... uet." Strange, though.
BBA, should I respond?... Like, run for the hills?... out of incontinence?... disgusting!)))
Spectator, I don't care about troll attacks these days, but I will respond to them, mostly when they're not directed at me. Evgeny Zhilyaev (EV6795), I've twice corrected "deliberately mispronounces," but instead of "mispronounces," it comes out as "...makes." Strange, though.
BBA, dear comrade BBA, go in the direction you've already been sent in many times!)))
Yevgeny Zhilyaev (EV6795), sir, you are such a generalizer and propagandist. You're spot on! I'm already exhausted by vigilance and the search for targets for criticism. Don't you think that, instead of calling for relaxation and raking out all sorts of characterizations for commentators, you should pay more attention to what you consider your own work? Which, thanks to your refined use of vignettes and Photoshop tricks, is becoming, unlike criticism, needed everywhere and by everyone?
BBA, Thank you!!!!!! And arguing with them is a real waste of time and energy And their yapping, general phrases, haven't moved me for a long time. It's just background noise, nothing more. They'll come up with something else soon. People live for this. They need a daily dose of negativity, disguised as a purity of photo rows. So let them yap—it doesn't move me at all.
Shot and styled in a postcard format and to resemble one. And the attackers' position is unclear: Spektaktor cites an article that pertains to God knows whose work. Malakhov, as usual, chides them for their behavior. Meanwhile, it's a very good work in the chosen genre. It's informative, beautiful, and most importantly, it's highlighted (by the way, using vignetting). I'd buy a postcard like that. I've copied some photos of Russian churches for my collection. Hello, SV
BBA, Associate Professor, I spent half a day pruning trees today, raspberries, too. Is my head sufficiently cleared?
But I'll mostly react to them when they're not addressed to me.
Yes? Will there be photos from you, or just reactions? Or would you be so kind as to elaborate on the kitsch aspect? Or, perhaps, when you find it inappropriate to return to kitsch, perhaps you'd be so kind as to say something about "adding artistry" here?
Evgeny Zhilyaev (EV6795),
Their goal is clear and understandable.
Tell me about mine? Perhaps I'm lost in a fog of prejudice, while you see it crystal clear?
Valeriy Sviderskiy, that is, "you're a fool yourself", that is, pardon me, "that's how I see it" and "surprise the world with masterpieces" - is this from "it's clear what position"?
Evgeny, no offense, but it turned out kitschy and vulgar... It looks pretty bad with the church ruins. Could you please tell me why these decorative elements are there? The composition could have been more harmonious, since the setting and theme are familiar, and the details allow for it...
BBA, well, I'm not exactly asking for a conversation either, but when I see things that are, to put it mildly, debatable, I ask questions. I assume the answers will be useful to everyone. And I assume they'll be deeper than the pediwiki formulas.
http://vladimirovich.livejournal.com/238680.html
Judging by your profile pictures, I can see it's hard for you
And their yapping, general phrases, haven't moved me for a long time. It's just background noise, nothing more. They'll come up with something else soon. People live for this. They need a daily dose of negativity, disguised as a purity of photo rows. So let them yap—it doesn't move me at all.
Hello, SV
Glad to see you!
That's right. Malakhov is in his element. Nothing changes with him over time.
And I don't even want to explain it to them. Their goal is clear and understandable.
Yes? Will there be photos from you, or just reactions? Or would you be so kind as to elaborate on the kitsch aspect? Or, perhaps, when you find it inappropriate to return to kitsch, perhaps you'd be so kind as to say something about "adding artistry" here?
Evgeny Zhilyaev (EV6795),
Tell me about mine? Perhaps I'm lost in a fog of prejudice, while you see it crystal clear?
Valeriy Sviderskiy, that is, "you're a fool yourself", that is, pardon me, "that's how I see it" and "surprise the world with masterpieces" - is this from "it's clear what position"?
I don't think I've ever had that problem. Glad to see you