***
Photo by Vicool, photographer. Everything and anything. Canon EOS 50D, published 03.10.2016.
Comments 17
Svetlana Lihanova
04.10.2016 19:25
Cool! I need to get this into my feed ASAP, otherwise I'm getting so few views. It's so unfair... all sorts of crap keeps flashing across my feed for days, while the good stuff just sits there in silence.
t p v 33.23
04.10.2016 19:32
Cool! We need to get this into the feed ASAP, otherwise it's not getting enough views. It's somehow unfair... all sorts of crap flashes across the feed for days, while the good work just goes by in silence (((
Svetlana Likhanova, I agree, it's good
Kalju4ii
Kalju4ii 121.15
04.10.2016 19:43
I like it! Respect!
Ant Art
Ant Art 63.28
04.10.2016 20:09
What exactly is good about this photo?
Aleksandr Zelenskiy
04.10.2016 20:30
What's so good about this photo?
MrSpoke, it's life from that time. Apparently, that's what "catches"
Ant Art
Ant Art 63.28
04.10.2016 20:37
MrSpoke, life is from that time. Apparently, that's what "catches" you.
Alexander Zelensky, what "time"? The picture is modern, after all. :curvesmile
Marina Glebova
04.10.2016 20:48
Alexander Zelensky, what "time"? The picture is modern, isn't it?
MrSpoke, I also think it was filmed a long time ago, not today.
Ant Art
Ant Art 63.28
04.10.2016 20:55
MrSpoke, I also think this was taken a long time ago, not today.
Marina Glebova, how long ago? 5-15 years? That's not a significant amount of time for photography, in my opinion. We can speculate on this forever until the author himself admits it
And by the way, there's a date in the EXIF data, just in case
EXIF data: Canon EOS 50D, 1/50 s, F/3.5, 33 mm, ISO 200, September 29, 2010
For me, if you approach my question from another angle, the framing isn't great.
Marina Glebova
04.10.2016 21:00
By the way, there's a date in the Exif, just in case
MrSpoke, then yes, it was recent, I didn't look ))
Aleksandr Zelenskiy
04.10.2016 21:00
What "time"? The picture is modern, isn't it?
MrSpoke, that's what's interesting: where did the author find the closet (attic) with all this "old stuff," and how did he manage to interest modern children (not the gadgets, mind you). There's no pretense (or did you see it?)
Aleksandr Zelenskiy
04.10.2016 21:02
Then yes, it's recent, I haven't looked yet ))
Marina Glebova, there's the possibility that the author doesn't have a scanner, etc.
Ant Art
Ant Art 63.28
04.10.2016 21:03
Alexander Zelensky,
For me, if you look at my question from the other side, the framing isn't great.
The objects are floating in the air, the girl is tucked in tightly. (I don't want to)
Vicool
Vicool 60.00
04.10.2016 21:03
For me, if you approach my question from a different angle, the framing isn't great.
Mr. Spoke, 1977, Praktica L. Cannon used for "digital conversion." Unfortunately, I can't find the negatives, but I'm hoping...
Ant Art
Ant Art 63.28
04.10.2016 21:04
Vicool, thanks
Now everyone will use this argument.
Aleksandr Zelenskiy
04.10.2016 21:07

Objects are floating in the air, the girl is tucked in, I don't want to)
MrSpoke, this is the particular as opposed to the general.
Ant Art
Ant Art 63.28
04.10.2016 21:12
Alexander Zelensky, the same to you. Unless a personal opinion speaks for everyone

Still, having children in the frame isn't enough. Especially since the author has some very interesting photos in his album.
Aleksandr Zelenskiy
04.10.2016 21:18
The author has some very interesting photos in his album.
Mr. Spoke, thanks for the recommendation, I'll be delighted to take a look.
Vicool
@vicool
Canon EOS 50D 29.09.2010 15:031/50 secF/3.533 mmISO200
Add photo to gallery